In Morgan v. State, the Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed the defendant’s child molestation conviction and held that it was not error for the trial court to exclude evidence that the alleged victim had made a prior allegation of molestation against someone else.
On appeal, the defendant contended that the girl’s prior allegation against her stepfather—that he had put his hand down the back of her pants in an effort to retrieve a cigarette he had dropped, and that he would often touch or rub his private area in front of her—were never prosecuted because they were false.
Under Georgia’s Rape Shield Statute, evidence related to an accuser’s past sexual behavior is generally inadmissible. One of the exceptions to this rule is for evidence that shows “the victim’s lack of credibility where the victim has made prior false allegations of child molestation.” Berry v. State, 235 Ga. App. 35 (1998).
The State argued that the stepfather was not prosecuted because it was determined that the conduct did not constitute child molestation, not because the allegations against him were untrue. The trial court found that since there was not a reasonable probability that the prior allegations were false, it did not fall under the exception to the Rape Shield Statute.
The defendant also argued that the trial court should have denied the State’s motion to exclude any reference to prescription drugs that the girl was taking. The defendant argued that he planned to cross-examine one of the State’s witnesses, a doctor, about the side effects of one of the girl’s medications. The State decided not to call the doctor, and because the defense had no witness who could testify on the matter, the trial court granted the State’s motion.
As a result, the Court upheld the trial court’s rulings and affirmed the defendant’s child molestation conviction.
In Rice v. State, the Defendant was convicted at a bench trial of seven counts of child molestation, two counts…December 1, 2020 Court of Appeals Affirms Granting of New Trial in Molestation Case
In the defendant’s motion for new trial, he contended that the jury’s verdict was against the weight of the evidence….November 10, 2020 Evidence of Dr. Phil Episode Secures Defendant a New Trial
In Tumlin v. State, the Georgia Court of Appeals reversed the defendant’s child molestation convictions, finding that he received ineffective…